11 ways to arbitrage the dating market
Part 6. Follows the “sparks are overrated” argument: if not romance, what should you seek? Dating as arbitrage — exploit markets where your value is higher and traits others under-price. Examples: a “mid” woman is a catch in the male-heavy British EA scene; White-Male/Asian-Female pairings exploit mismatched beauty standards and tolerances.
The 11 tactics
- Avoid sexual dominance. Male and female sexualities aren’t perfect complements; men who genuinely enjoy “erotic violence” are, in her anecdotes, disproportionately unkind (shout at juniors, cheat, abuse). Violence in bed correlates with violence in general. Seek a man who’s competent and willing, not one who craves it.
- Think of the children. Select for traits you want in kids (healthy, confident, curious, driven), which sometimes differ from what you want in a partner. Another reason to avoid dominance — you may want a kinky husband but vanilla children.
- Looks: sell looks, buy character. Chasing handsome men reflects poor time preference (you’ll spend ~half the marriage elderly). When you do buy looks, buy health-linked ones (weight, skin, symmetry), not mere good fortune.
- Height → really “size.” Women want to feel petite; broad-shouldered short men achieve the same effect, and apps can’t filter for shoulder width. Arbitrage the under-priced broad short man.
- Age. Women’s preference for older men is stronger than men’s for youth — so date younger than you’re inclined to.
- Money. Young people overrate status and underrate money. Date men who earn well doing something boring or “a bit evil” (insurance, oil, finance, logistics), not high-status arts jobs. Better still, marry a future-rich man (PhD student, law school, grad scheme, early startup); a smart, hardworking unambitious man can be turned into a high earner.
- Hobbies. Shared hobbies are overrated and mostly gendered. If you have an interest men love (e.g. war), lean in; otherwise don’t worry about sharing niche feminine hobbies. Get good at explaining things — info-dumping is delightful “from people you love.”
- Politics / values — most overrated. Shared ideology is an unstable foundation because your views (and your partner’s) will change; she went woke communist → libertarian → market-oriented centrist. Better to build on mutual esteem and defer to each other’s expertise. Caveats/dealbreakers: don’t date someone who thinks you’re stupid or evil; some belief differences are structural (e.g. stay-at-home motherhood); avoid partners with a “trump card” (e.g. religious mandates) that supersedes all your values.
- Good husbands aren’t always good boyfriends. Lavish-date spenders make spendthrift husbands; over-accommodating people may expect you to accommodate once married; obsessive tidiness/gym/fashion habits become your problem. A man’s dating behaviour shows how he treats strangers, not necessarily a wife.
- The apps. People who avoid apps are hard to meet, so their “price” doesn’t reflect market value — buy the “appless man” at a discount. Look for good men with bad profiles (too squeamish to ask friends for help).
- Date your friends. Dating easily filters people out for shallow reasons; it’s hard to discover a heart of gold. With long-known friends you already know their character — some weird, low-status friends would make “damn good husbands.”
Overall framing
- Aim for a relationship where both value each other far above any likely replacement — someone who values what’s special about you and feels lucky.
- Chief method: cultivate healthy thought patterns and use the halo effect to your advantage.
- Second: learn to sell yourself. Identify your under-supplied traits (hers: emotional control and lack of neediness) and lean into them — ambition, niche knowledge, organisation, cooking, etc.